“EU incoherence and inconsistency over Libya”: evidence to the contrary
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
On the Inconsistency of Mumma's Eu
In several articles, John Mumma has presented a formal diagrammatic system Eu meant to give an account of one way in which Euclid’s use of diagrams in the Elements could be formalized. However, largely because of the way in which it tries to limit case analysis, this system ends up being inconsistent, as shown here. Eu also suffers from several other problems: it is unable to prove several wide...
متن کاملEvidence Contrary to the Statistical View of Boosting
The statistical perspective on boosting algorithms focuses on optimization, drawing parallels with maximum likelihood estimation for logistic regression. In this paper we present empirical evidence that raises questions about this view. Although the statistical perspective provides a theoretical framework within which it is possible to derive theorems and create new algorithms in general contex...
متن کاملEvidence Contrary to the Existing Exo-Planet Migration Concept
Exo-planet migration is assumed to have occurred to explain close-to-star gas giant exoplanets within the context of the so-called standard model of solar system formation, rather than giving cause to question the validity of that particular model. I present evidence against the concept of planet migration, evidence that is historical, interdisciplinary, and model-independent. First, I demonstr...
متن کاملEvidence to the Contrary: Weekly Returns Have Momentum
Reversal is the current stylized fact of weekly returns. To the contrary, we find a robust and dominant momentum in one-week returns. The brief reversal that follows extreme weekly returns is itself followed by an opposing stream of continuation in returns. These subsequent momentum profits are strong enough to offset the initial reversal and to produce a significant momentum effect over the fu...
متن کاملthe relationship between efl learners linguistic and logical intelligence and the frequency and types of informal fallacies and evidence in argumentative writing
مطالعه حاضر با هدف بررسی وجود رابطه ی ممکن میان هوشهای زبانی و منطقی زبان آموزان انگلیسی و تعداد و انواع مغلطه های زبانی و شواهد در متنهای استدلالی آنان انجام پذیرفته است.بدین منظور، 70 زبان آموز با سطح زبانی متوسط به بالا از دو موسسه زبان انگلیسی در ایران انتخاب شده و پرسشنامه های مزبوطه را تکمیل نموده و متنی استدلالی نوشتند. متون نوشته شده مورد بررسی قرار گرفته و نمرات پرسشنامه ها محاسبه شده ...
15 صفحه اولذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Cahiers de la Méditerranée
سال: 2014
ISSN: 0395-9317,1773-0201
DOI: 10.4000/cdlm.7767